Last year I said on social media that The 100 was a terrible show. I saw the first few episodes of this loose adaptation of Kass Morgan’s novel, and I wasn’t even remotely impressed. This year, my brother-in-law convinced me to give it another shot, as it had become one of his favourites. Having nothing else to do, I did as he asked and watched the first season on Netflix.

I was wrong and he was right.

Genre(s): Sci-Fi

Created By: Jason Rothenberg

Network: The CW

Air Date: Season 3 begins this Fall

Good:

  • Strong writing and acting.

  • Fantastic visual design.

  • Doesn’t shy away from dark stories.

Bad:

  • Terrible pilot.

  • Unoriginal terms and names.

  • Grounder plot could’ve used some work.

Review

After a Nuclear war the Earth became an uninhabitable radioactive dump, forcing humanity into space stations that over time join to form the unoriginally named Ark. The Ark holds the last vestiges of humanity as they wait until such a time as they can return home. To make sure everyone works for the community, all crimes are punishable by ‘Floating’, which in The 100 is code for “we’ll shoot you out of an airlock!” That is unless you’re a minor, in which case they lock up you for a few months.

That’s what the eponymous 100 are—One hundred criminal kids. With the Ark’s resources dwindling and life support slowly failing, the Ark Council decides to send the 100 to Earth, to check if the planet can support life. For all the 100 know, it’s a death sentence in a radioactive wasteland. Instead, they find an almost pristine, nature-retaken planet. They land in a lush forest.

Humanity's last hope, a rust bucket!
Humanity’s last hope, a rust bucket!

But it’s not the Earth itself that starts killing them like teenagers in a slasher movie, but their neighbours, the unoriginally named ‘Grounders’, Viking-like people living on the ground since the time the first humans left for space, surviving and adapting to their new world.

The 100 doesn’t have the strongest opening. The reason for sending the kids down is a bit contrived—and might as well be “just because”—and the status quo and relationships and conflicts between the kids are ridiculous, just episodes of leadership and domination battles between Belamy and Clarke. But to balance that out, they introduce the Grounders and the threat they pose and don’t abandon the Ark storylines, showing you how things degrade in space and revealing some of the more heinous acts the leadership has committed to keep things stable. And of course, they start killing the kids off. It doesn’t take long for there not to be a hundred of them. This is a show that goes dark very often and I’m glad it does.

Everything on the ground you see from the 100’s point of view, in that unless one of them is present in the scene, you don’t learn of the world around them. It’s a very good approach as it keeps the mystery for as long as possible. On the Ark on the other hand you see things from many points of view, learning just how crappy life in space can be.

There's lots this season you just don't see coming!
There’s lots this season you just don’t see coming!

But what finally hooked me on The 100 were the characters. One you move past the annoying leadership and faction nonsense, characters really start developing, and you learn their origins and their fears and you see them growing out of them or falling deeper down the super-fun-slide of psychosis. Even the characters you think are complete bastards turn out to have a lot of depth and become relatable. Marcus Kane, a council member and head of security on the Ark is an example—he becomes less of a murderous antagonist as the season goes by. On the ground the equivalent is Belamy, at first an idiot taking command of the 100’s makeshift camp—built around their dropship—and later becoming one of the best characters in the series. Clarke goes from determined young woman to the absolute leader of the group, crossing more and more lines as she’s forced to do what’s necessary to survive. And then there are Finn and Murphy. Finn is the absolute good guy in the first season, always taking the high road, and Murphy’s the complete opposite, a unforgivable monster of a kid, for lack of a better term that is still polite among company. Oh, screw it! He’s a douchenugget from start to finish.

In terms of visual design—a term I find very strange to use outside of a video game—they do a bang up job with the Ark, making it look futuristic and still derelict—steel corridors with scorch marks and emergency welds. The Ark people dress mostly in hand-me-down rags, which they are. If you die, your stuff goes to the community and it made me feel a bit weird that they’re all wearing dead people’s clothing. This is not high-tech, with lasers and super-science but the “we’re barely keeping things together” kind of Sci-Fi. The technological level isn’t very high and things usually get resolved the medieval way—with copious amounts of threats and violence. On the ground, it’s all wilderness and shacks, a mix of survivor and Mad Max. Things are gritty, deadly and people die every episode in horribly painful ways—the acid cloud being the worst to be honest—but there are also beautiful landscapes and bright open areas, giving you a sense of awe every so often to break the tension, making the next emotional moment much more intense.

This is the evil kid, Murphy!
This is the evil kid, Murphy!

The performances are strong all around…after the pilot. We’ve established that the start is atrocious but it does get better. Eliza Taylor’s performance as Clarke is phenomenal and she’s one of the most believable actors in the show. Bob Morley’s and Marie Avgeropoulos are equally strong as the Blake twins, Bellamy and Octavia. The latter in particular becomes one of the strongest characters in the show. It was a surprise to see Dichen Lachman in the 100 as Anya, one of the Grounder leaders. She and Tristan (Joseph Gatt) become the main antagonists for the season, leading the grounder forces in attacking The 100 camp. On the Ark, Henry Ian Cusick is outstanding as Kane and I immediately recognized Jean Paige Turco, who playes Clarke’s sometimes-annoying but just as badass mum.

The conflict with the Grounder is the season’s main plot, but don’t expect any deep reason behind it. The Grounders hunt and kill The 100 because they’re in their territory and being the stereotypical Vikings they are, they can’t see that it’s a bunch of kids and start picking them up with greater efficiency and zeal than Jason Voorhees.The only character from this group not to show this level of tunnel vision is Octavia’s love interest, Lincoln, one of the most badass characters on TV—hands down.

I’m not a fan of the overall plot, as you can say the Grounders’ reason for attacking is “because.” The season gives you glimpses into who they are as a people but not enough to give their aggression a bit of much-needed context.

The 100 goes dark very often, including violence, murder and torture!
The 100 goes dark very often, including violence, murder and torture!

Conclusion

The 100 starts off weak, but once you get past the first set of episodes it all picks up significantly and keeps its pace and momentum all the way to the outstanding and intense season finale. With strong performances, beautiful landscapes and fantastic set design, this is a Sci-Fi series you should give a watch

TMA SCORE:

4/5 – Exceptional

6 Comments »

  1. Ah, glad to see “douchenugget” catching on. It’s a term I use for Finn, though. UGH. FINN.

    To be honest I don’t see the Grounders’ wrath as being “just because”. If I were a member of a tribe whose ancestors had been stuck on Earth and forced to survive hand to mouth, I too would probably want to kill the Sky People who returned with superior technology and numbered one hundred. Their attitude to them makes a lot of sense I think, especially when you consider who the big bads of Season Two are.

    Agreed on Henry Ian Cusick though, he’s great as Kane and one of my favourite characters. It was also crazy seeing Ricky Whittle (Lincoln) on The 100, as he used to be in a British soap called Hollyoaks back in the day.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I use the term on both 100 reviews, the Season 2 coming in a couple of days! I use it quite freely on the next one. And full credit goes to you for teaching me that word! 😛

      As for the Grounders, if you take Season 2 into consideration then a lot makes sense, but if you just look at it from Season 1 and what you know/are told about the Grounders, it’s more or less unprovoked aggression or an overblown response to them being in their ‘territory’.

      Season 2 does a much better job of explaining the world, but the first season could’ve given you a bit more context. I think one key moment was the bridge meet with Anya. It was a scene where they could’ve given you that context and add even more tension, but they rushed it to push the conflict.

      During season 1 I didn’t have many issues with Finn. The love triangle bit made me gag and he was a complete tit in that regard, but he wasn’t as despicable a character as Murphy for example. Season 2 is another matter entirely hahaha

      That’s awesome about Ricky Whittle, I wouldn’t have expected him to have worked in a soap!
      It also surprised me to learn that Henry Ian Cusick is Peruvian!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s